Energy Consumption of Secondary Water Supply System in Typical Old Residential Quarters in Shanghai under the Background of "Double Carbon"
-
摘要: 通过对上海典型老旧居民小区的多层建筑和高层建筑供水系统进行研究,对比分析了二次供水水泵在不同工况下的水量、能耗及效率方面的差异。结果表明,由于水池+变频水泵模式下水泵一天内主要时段的供水水量远低于额定流量,因此在满足相同供水需求时,水池+变频水泵模式下水泵的运行效率是水池+工频水泵+屋顶水箱模式下水泵运行效率的50%左右。部分水箱存在因位置距离顶楼过近,仅凭重力流无法满足供水压力需求的情况,水池+工频水泵+屋顶水箱模式需要再次加压,屋顶水泵再次加压的能耗约为泵房变频水泵能耗的200%以上,水池+变频水泵模式下总体能耗更低。Abstract: Taking the water supply of mid-rise buildings and high-rise buildings in typical old residential areas in Shanghai as the research object, this paper analyzes and compares the water flow, energy consumption and efficiency of secondary water supply pumps under different working conditions. The water supply flow in the main period of the day in the cistern+variable frequency pump mode is much lower than the rated flow, therefore, under the condition of meeting the same water supply target, the operating efficiency of the cistern+variable frequency pump is about 50% of that in the cistern+main frequency pump+water tank mode. However, some water tanks are too close to the top floor residents to meet the water supply pressure demand only by gravity flow. The cistern+main frequency pump+water tank mode needs to be repressurized, and the repressurization energy consumption of the roof water pump is about 200% of the energy consumption of the variable frequency pump in the pump station. At this time, the energy consumption of the cistern+variable frequency pump mode is lower.
-
Key words:
- secondary water supply /
- carbon neutrality /
- carbon emission peak /
- pump energy consumption /
- water flow
-
表 1 A、B两小区水泵参数情况
Table 1. Water pump parameters of community A and B
Water supply zone Number of households Number of buildings Pump of station parameters Roof pump parameters High-rise building of community A 180 1 Q=20.5 m3/h, H=64.5 m, N=5.5 kW — Mid-rise building of community A 204 11 Q=20.5 m3/h, H=47.9 m, N=4.0 kW Q=3 m3/h, H=27 m, N=0.55 kW Mid-rise building of community B 392 18 Q=36 m3/h, H=43.1 m, N=7.5 kW Q=3 m3/h, H=27 m, N=0.55 kW -
[1] 李洪言, 李家龙, 林名桢, 等. “碳中和”背景下2020年全球能源供需分析[J]. 天然气与石油, 2021, 39(6): 132-143. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5539.2021.06.021 [2] 王一鸣. 中国碳达峰碳中和目标下的绿色低碳转型: 战略与路径[J]. 全球化, 2021(6): 5-18,133. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0675.2021.06.001 [3] 印雨乔. 小区供水泵站变频变压供水优化研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳建筑大学, 2019. [4] 张中祥, 宋梅. 碳中和背景下资源型城市转型面临的新挑战新机遇[J]. 国家治理, 2022(6): 47-51. [5] 曹扬, 严志权, 陈子尧, 等. 建筑能耗现状及节能潜力[J]. 现代物业(中旬刊), 2017(5): 66-73. [6] 赵潇然, 汪力, 李阔, 等. 供水系统水泵机组节能改造方法与工程实例[J]. 给水排水, 2022, 48(2): 1-5, 12. [7] 李皓伟, 薛建康. 原水提升泵站节能改造浅析[J]. 通用机械, 2017(11): 58-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7139.2017.11.017 [8] 黄玉珠. 超高层建筑给水方式的能耗计算[J]. 建筑节能, 2020, 48(5): 106-110. -