DeepOCSR：一种用于光学化学结构识别的深度编码-解码网络

杨赵朋; 李建华

doi:10.14135/j.cnki.1006-3080.20210916002

DeepOCSR：一种用于光学化学结构识别的深度编码-解码网络

doi: 10.14135/j.cnki.1006-3080.20210916002

杨赵朋,
李建华^,

华东理工大学信息科学与工程学院, 上海 200237

基金项目: 国家科技重大专项“现代中药组成资源库公共平台建设”（2018ZX09735002）

详细信息

作者简介:
杨赵朋（1996—），男，河南人，硕士生，主要研究方向为计算机视觉。E-mail：y30190800@mail.ecust.edu.cn

通讯作者:
李建华， E-mail：jhli@ecust.edu.cn

中图分类号: TP391
计量
- 文章访问数: 73
- HTML全文浏览量: 45
- PDF下载量: 15
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-09-16
- 录用日期: 2021-12-31
- 网络出版日期: 2022-04-15

DeepOCSR: A Deep Encoder-Decoder Network for Optical Chemical Structure Recognition

YANG Zhaopeng,
LI Jianhua^,

School of Information Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China

摘要

摘要: 从科学出版物中识别光学化学结构是重新发现化学结构性质的重要组成部分，但基于规则的方法和新兴的深度学习方法都面临着识别率低的问题。本文提出了一种用于光学化学结构识别的深度学习方法（DeepOCSR）。该方法基于编码器-解码器架构，引入了Transformer和ResNeSt模型，将出版物中的化学结构图像转换为SMILES序列。构建了两种新的化学结构数据集，其中一个包含了化学文献中常见的取代基。将本文方法与现有的其他方法进行对比实验，结果表明本文方法在相似度和有效性等关键指标上均优于对比方法。
- 深度学习 /
- 化学结构识别 /
- 编码器-解码器 /
- SMILES /
- 取代基
Abstract: Optical chemical structure recognition from scientific publications is an essential part of rediscovering a chemical structure. Rule-based approaches and emerging deep learning methods both face certain problems, such as a low recognition rate. In this paper, we propose DeepOCSR, a deep learning method for optical chemical structure recognition. Based on the encoder–decoder architecture, this method introduces Transformer and ResNeSt models for converting chemical structure images from publications into SMILES sequences. To train and verify our method, two novel chemical structure datasets were constructed, one of which contained common substituents in the chemical literature. Our proposed method has been extensively tested against existing publicly available deep-learning approaches. The experimental results show that our method outperforms the compared approaches in several pivotal evaluation metrics, including similarity and validity, proving the effectiveness of our method.
- deep learning /
- chemical structure recognition /
- encoder-decoder /
- SMILES /
- substituents

HTML全文

图 1 基于DeepOCSR的化学结构识别框架

Figure 1. Chemical structure recognition framework based on DeepOCSR

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 化学结构编码流程

Figure 2. Chemical structure encoding process

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 DeepSMILES序列解码流程

Figure 3. DeepSMILES sequence decoding process

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 生成化学结构图示例

CC(C)C[C@@H](C(=O)O)NC(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H]1CCN=C(N)N1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(=O)N)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C=O

Figure 4. Example of generating a chemical structure diagram

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 CSDD-SUB数据集上DeepSMILES序列的长度分布

Figure 5. Distribution of lengths of DeepSMILES on CSDD-SUB dataset

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 在CSDD-SUB 验证集上的损失值（a）和准确率（b）变化曲线

Figure 6. Loss (a) and accuracy (b) variation curves on CSDD-SUB validation set

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 DeepOCSR和DECIMER在训练集上的收敛曲线

Figure 7. Convergence curves of DeepOCSR and DECIMER on training sets

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 DeepOCSR在不同长度DeepSMILES的预测性能

Figure 8. Prediction performance of DeepOCSR on DeepSMILES with different lengths

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 模型参数量和批处理时间的比较

Table 1. Comparison of model parameter numbers and batch processing times

Modl	Params/MB	Batch time/s
DA-LSTM	58.25	0.71
DeepOCSR	64.16	0.64

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同堆叠层数时模型的性能比较结果

Table 2. Model performance comparison results with different number of stacking layers

N	Accuracy	Similarity	Validity	BLEU
2	88.65	0.977	0.9943	0.9898
4	90.25	0.984	0.9943	0.9907
6	91.71	0.988	0.9958	0.9920

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 3种方法在两种测试集上的比较

Table 3. Comparison of three methods on two test sets

Data set	Method	Accuracy	Similarity	Validity	BLEU
CSDD	MolVec	47.19	0.841	0.7775	0.6780
	DA-LSTM	70.90	0.917	0.9914	0.9423
	DeepOCSR	82.26	0.963	0.9940	0.9709
CSDD-SUB	MolVec	17.03	0.485	0.8647	0.5547
	DA-LSTM	76.10	0.959	0.9585	0.9657
	DeepOCSR	91.71	0.988	0.9958	0.9910

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 数据集划分

Table 4. Division of dataset

Dataset index	Method	Data size/ KB	Train data size	Val data size	Test data size
1	DECIMER	60	54000	0	6000
1	DA-LSTM, DeepOCSR	60	48000	6000	6000
2	DECIMER	100	90000	0	10000
2	DA-LSTM, DeepOCSR	100	80000	10000	10000
3	DECIMER	500	450000	0	50000
3	DA-LSTM, DeepOCSR	500	400000	50000	50000

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 3种方法在测试集上的性能比较

Table 5. Performance comparison of three approaches on testing set

Dataset index	Method	Epoch	Similarity	Validity
1	DA-LSTM	60	0.928	0.9925
	DECIMER	600	0.387	0.8992
	DeepOCSR	60	0.970	0.9977
2	DA-LSTM	60	0.960	0.9979
	DECIMER	600	0.399	0.8913
	DeepOCSR	60	0.984	0.9992
3	DA-LSTM	60	0.990	0.9989
	DECIMER	600	0.470	0.9805
	DeepOCSR	60	0.997	0.9996

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(31)

[1]	MCDANIEL J R, BALMUTH J R. Kekule: OCR-optical chemical (structure) recognition[J]. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 1992, 32(4): 373-381. doi: 10.1021/ci00008a018
[2]	CASEY R, BOYER S, HEALEY P, et al. Optical recognition of chemical graphics[C]//2nd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR'93). Japan : IEEE, 1993: 627-631.
[3]	IBISON P, JACQUOT M, KAM F, et al. Chemical literature data extraction: The CLiDE project[J]. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 1993, 33(3): 338-344. doi: 10.1021/ci00013a010
[4]	FRASCONI P, GABBRIELLI F, LIPPI M, et al. Markov logic networks for optical chemical structure recognition[J]. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2014, 54(8): 2380-2390. doi: 10.1021/ci5002197
[5]	PARK J, ROSANIA G R, SHEDDEN K A, et al. Automated extraction of chemical structure information from digital raster images[J]. Chemistry Central Journal, 2009, 3(1): 1-16. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-3-1
[6]	FILIPPOV I V, NICKLAUS M C. Optical structure recognition software to recover chemical information: OSRA, an open source solution[J]. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2009, 49(3): 740-743. doi: 10.1021/ci800067r
[7]	PERYEA T, KATZEL D, ZHAO T, et al. MOLVEC: Open source library for chemical structure recognition[C]//Proceedings of the Abstracts of Papers of The American Chemical Society. USA : ACS, 2019: 258.
[8]	VINYALS O, TOSHEV A, BENGIO S, et al. Show and tell: A neural image caption generator[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. USA : IEEE, 2015: 3156-3164.
[9]	SZEGEDY C, LIU W, JIA Y, et al. Going deeper with convolutions[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. USA : IEEE, 2015: 1-9.
[10]	ZAREMBA W, SUTSKEVER I, VINYALS O. Recurrent neural network regularization[EB/OL]// (2014-09-08)[2021-09-01].https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.2329v5.
[11]	HOCHREITER S, SCHMIDHUBER J. Long short-term memory[J]. Neural Computation, 1997, 9(8): 1735-1780. doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
[12]	CHO K, VAN MERRIëNBOER B, GULCEHRE C, et al. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation[C]//Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Qatar : ACL, 2014: 1724-1734.
[13]	XU K, BA J, KIROS R, et al. Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption generation with visual attention[C]// Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. France : PMLR, 2015: 2048-2057.
[14]	ZHANG H, WU C, ZHANG Z, et al. Resnest: Split-attention networks[EB/OL]//(2020-04-19)[2021-09-01].https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.08955v2.
[15]	WEININGER D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system: 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules[J]. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 1988, 28(1): 31-36.
[16]	VASWANI A, SHAZEER N, PARMAR N, et al. Attention is all you need[C]//Proceedings of the Advances in neural information processing systems. USA : NIPS, 2017: 5998-6008.
[17]	VALKO A T, JOHNSON A P. CLiDE Pro: the latest generation of CLiDE, a tool for optical chemical structure recognition[J]. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2009, 49(4): 780-787. doi: 10.1021/ci800449t
[18]	KARZEL D, NAKAGAWA K, FUJIYOSHI A, et al. Inconsistency-Driven chemical graph construction in cheminfty[C]// Proceedings of the International Workshop on Graphics Recognition. Korea : Springer, 2011: 119-128.
[19]	SADAWI N M, SEXTON A P, SORGE V. Chemical structure recognition: A rule-based approach[C]//Proceedings of the Document Recognition and Retrieval XIX. USA : SPIE, 2012: 82970D-82970E.
[20]	STAKER J, MARSHALL K, ABEL R, et al. Molecular structure extraction from documents using deep learning[J]. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2019, 59(3): 1017-1029. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00669
[21]	RAJAN K, ZIELESNY A, STEINBECK C. DECIMER: Towards deep learning for chemical image recognition[J]. Journal of Cheminformatics, 2020, 12(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1186/s13321-019-0407-y
[22]	OLDENHOF M, ARANY A, MOREAU Y, et al. ChemGrapher: Optical graph recognition of chemical compounds by deep learning[J]. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2020, 60(10): 4506-4517. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00459
[23]	DALKE A. DeepSMILES: An adaptation of SMILES for use in machine-learning of chemical structures[EB/OL]// (2018-09-19)[2021-09-01].https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.7097960.v1.
[24]	HE K, ZHANG X, REN S, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. USA : IEEE, 2016: 770-778.
[25]	XIE S, GIRSHICK R, DOLLáR P, et al. Aggregated residual transformations for deep neural networks[C]// Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, USA : IEEE, 2017: 1492-1500.
[26]	HU J, SHEN L, SUN G. Squeeze-and-excitation networks[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. USA : IEEE, 2018: 7132-7141.
[27]	ZHANG H, GOODFELLOW I, METAXAS D, et al. Self-attention generative adversarial networks[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. USA : PMLR, 2019: 7354-7363.
[28]	STEINBECK C, HAN Y, KUHN S, et al. The chemistdevelopment kit (CDK): An open-source Java library for chemo- and bioinformatics[J]. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 2003, 43(2): 493-500. doi: 10.1021/ci025584y
[29]	KIM S, CHEN J, CHENG T, et al. PubChem 2019 update: Improved access to chemical data[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2019, 47(D1): D1102-D1109. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1033
[30]	PAPINENI K, ROUKOS S, WARD T, et al. BLEU: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation[C]//Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. USA : ACL, 2002: 311-318.
[31]	季秀怡, 李建华. 基于双路注意力机制的化学结构图像识别[J]. 计算机工程, 2020, 46(9): 213-220.