高级检索

    埋地掺氢天然气管道泄漏地表响应与监测布点

    Surface Response and Sensor Layout for Leakage from Buried Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Pipelines

    • 摘要: 针对炼化企业埋地掺氢天然气管道泄漏早期识别与监测布点需求,构建6.00 m×0.80 m×1.25 m土壤箱实验系统,箱体上表面开放其上布设CH4/H2传感器阵列,开展不同压力、掺氢体积分数和泄漏位置下的受控泄漏及持续监测实验。以气体首次检测时间(First Gas-detection Time, FGT)和首次危险时间(First Dangerous Time, FDT)评价地表响应、危险形成及预警窗口。结果表明,FGT,FDT及预警窗口不随压力或掺氢体积分数单调变化。泄漏位置会导致最早响应区和最早危险区迁移,且二者不一定重合。T1工况下,最早FGT为2min,最早FDT为22min,预警窗口为20 min。H2传感器更适合早期识别,CH4传感器结合FDT判据更适合危险校核。炼化企业厂区监测布点应以FGT为核心,并在弯头、阀门、检查井壁和构筑物边界等部位加密布点。

       

      Abstract: To meet the need for early leakage identification and sensor layout for buried hydrogen-blended natural gas pipelines in refining and petrochemical sites, an open-top soil-bin system measuring 6.00 m × 0.80 m × 1.25 m was constructed. Methane (CH4) and hydrogen (H2) sensors were arranged on the soil surface. Controlled leakage experiments followed by continuous monitoring were conducted under different absolute pressures, hydrogen blending ratios, and leakage locations. The hydrogen blending ratio was defined as the volume percentage of H2 in the H2/CH4 mixture. The first gas-detection time (FGT) and first dangerous time (FDT) were used to characterize the surface response, hazard formation, and warning window. The warning window was calculated as the earliest FDT minus the earliest FGT. The results showed that FGT, FDT, and the warning window did not vary monotonically with pressure or hydrogen blending ratio. Changes in leakage location shifted the earliest response zone and the earliest hazardous zone, and the two zones did not always coincide. Under test T1, the earliest FGT was 2 min, the earliest FDT was 22 min, and the warning window was 20 min. At all four monitoring groups under T1, the H2 channel responded earlier than the corresponding CH4 channel. This result supports the use of H2 sensors for early leakage identification. Combined CH4/H2 measurements and the FDT criterion can be used for hazard verification. Under the present experimental conditions, FGT can serve as the primary indicator for sensor layout, while FDT can be used to verify the warning margin. Sensor density should be increased near elbows, valves, inspection-well walls, and structural boundaries. Final sensor locations and spacing should also be verified against site-specific soil, underground structures, and surface environmental conditions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回