高级检索

    胡宏玖, 李培宁. 各种表面裂纹疲劳扩展分析方法的比较[J]. 华东理工大学学报(自然科学版), 1996, (5): 577-582.
    引用本文: 胡宏玖, 李培宁. 各种表面裂纹疲劳扩展分析方法的比较[J]. 华东理工大学学报(自然科学版), 1996, (5): 577-582.
    Comparison of Some Analysis Methods of Fatigue Growth for Surface Crack[J]. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology, 1996, (5): 577-582.
    Citation: Comparison of Some Analysis Methods of Fatigue Growth for Surface Crack[J]. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology, 1996, (5): 577-582.

    各种表面裂纹疲劳扩展分析方法的比较

    Comparison of Some Analysis Methods of Fatigue Growth for Surface Crack

    • 摘要: 介绍了两类预测表面裂纹疲劳扩展中的形貌变化及其剩余寿命的方法,并进行实验验证。结果表明,“Cycle by cycle”方法的估算最为准确,川原正言等的经验方法也具有较好的精度。

       

      Abstract: Two kinds of methods for predicting crack shape and fatigue life of surface flaw were investigated. It was demonstrated the predicted values by means of "cycle by cycle" and those by Kawahara and Kurihara's empirical equation,especial by the former,were close to the experiment results.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回